GTVRG TSUNAMI DISASTER 2004 DATABASE

German Tsunami Victims Response Group e.V. was established as a non-profit German tsunami victims organisation acting worldwide to prevent man-made disasters. Anyone can contribute. Donate and help our association. Account for Donations: IBAN: DE32 7012 0400 7076 3160 04, BIC: DABBDEMMXXX

Powered By Blogger

Samstag, 10. September 2016

TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM



The Tsunami Warning System

An international effort to save lives and protect property

The following material is excerpted from Tsunami! The Great Waves
  • Overview of the Tsunami Warning System
  • Tsunami Warning Centers
  • Tsunami Watch and Warning Determination
  • Tsunami Warning Dissemination

Overview of the Tsunami Warning System

The Tsunami Warning System (TWS) in the Pacific, comprised of 26 participating international Member States, has the functions of monitoring seismological and tidal stations throughout the Pacific Basin to evaluate potentially tsunamigenic earthquakes and disseminating tsunami warning information. The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) is the operational center of the Pacific TWS. Located near Honolulu, Hawaii, PTWC provides tsunami warning information to national authorities in the Pacific Basin.

Tsunami Warning Centers

As part of an international cooperative effort to save lives and protect property, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Weather Service operates two tsunami warning centers. The Alaska Tsunami Warning Center ATWC) in Palmer, Alaska, serves as the regional Tsunami Warning Center for Alaska, British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and California.
The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center in Ewa Beach, Hawaii, serves as the regional Tsunami Warning Center for Hawaii and as a national/international warning center for tsunamis that pose a Pacific-wide threat. This international warning effort became a formal arrangement in 1965 when PTWC assumed the international warning responsibilities of the Pacific Tsunami Warning System (PTWS). The PTWS is composed of 26 international Member States that are organized as the International Coordination Group for the Tsunami Warning System in the Pacific.

Tsunami Watch and Warning Determination

The objective of the PTWS is to detect, locate, and determine the magnitude of potentially tsunamigenic earthquakes occurring in the Pacific Basin or its immediate margins. Earthquake information is provided by seismic stations operated by PTWC, ATWC, the U.S. Geological Survey's National Earthquake Information Center and international sources. If the location and magnitude of an earthquake meet the known criteria for generation of a tsunami, a tsunami warning is issued to warn of an imminent tsunami hazard. The warning includes predicted tsunami arrival times at selected coastal communities within the geographic area defined by the maximum distance the tsunami could travel in a few hours. A tsunami watch with additional predicted tsunami arrival times is issued for a geographic area defined by the distance the tsunami could travel in a subsequent time period.
If a significant tsunami is detected by sea-level monitoring instrumentation, the tsunami warning is extended to the entire Pacific Basin. Sea-level (or tidal) information is provided by NOAA's National Ocean Service, PTWC, ATWC, university monitoring networks and other participating nations of the PTWS. The International Tsunami Information Center, part of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, monitors and evaluates the performance and effectiveness of the Pacific Tsunami Warning System. This effort encourages the most effective data collection, data analysis, tsunami impact assessment and warning dissemination to all TWS participants.

Tsunami Warning Dissemination

Tsunami watch, warning, and information bulletins are disseminated to appropriate emergency officials and the general public by a variety of communication methods.

  • Tsunami watch, warning and information bulletins issued by PTWC and ATWC are disseminated to local, state, national and international users as well as the media. These users, in turn, disseminate the tsunami information to the public, generally over commercial radio and television channels.
  • The NOAA Weather Radio System, based on a large number of VHF transmitter sites, provides direct broadcast of tsunami information to the public.
  • The US Coast Guard also broadcasts urgent marine warnings and related tsunami information to coastal users equipped with medium frequency (MF) and very high frequency (VHF) marine radios.
  • Local authorities and emergency managers are responsible for formulating and executing evacuation plans for areas under a tsunami warning. The public should stay-tuned to the local media for evacuation orders should a tsunami warning be issued. And, the public should NOT RETURN to low-lying areas until the tsunami threat has passed and the "all clear" is announced by the local authorities.  http://earthweb.ess.washington.edu/tsunami/general/warning/warning.html

Member States of the International Coordination Group for the Tsunami Warning System



  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • China
  • Columbia
  • Commonwealth of Independent States, Russian Federation
  • Cook Islands
  • Costa Rica
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Ecuador
  • Fiji
  • France
  • Guatemala
  • Indonesia
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Republic of Korea
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
  • United Kingdom (Hong Kong)
  • United States of America
  • Western Samoa

    Tsunami warning system

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
    This article reads like an editorial or opinion piece. (April 2011)
    This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2011)

    Evacuation route sign in a low-lying coastal area on the West Coast of the United States
    A tsunami warning system (TWS) is used to detect tsunamis in advance and issue warnings to prevent loss of life and damage. It is made up of two equally important components: a network of sensors to detect tsunamis and a communications infrastructure to issue timely alarms to permit evacuation of the coastal areas. There are two distinct types of tsunami warning systems: international and regional. When operating, seismic alerts are used to instigate the watches and warnings; then, data from observed sea level height (either shore-based tide gauges or DART buoys) are used to verify the existence of a tsunami. Other systems have been proposed to augment the warning procedures; for example, it has been suggested that the duration and frequency content of t-wave energy (which is earthquake energy trapped in the ocean SOFAR channel) is indicative of an earthquake's tsunami potential.[1]

    History and forecasting

    The first rudimentary system to alert communities of an impending tsunami was attempted in Hawaii in the 1920s. More advanced systems were developed in the wake of the April 1, 1946 (caused by the 1946 Aleutian Islands earthquake) and May 23, 1960 (caused by the 1960 Valdivia earthquake) tsunamis which caused massive devastation in Hilo, Hawaiisource needed. While tsunamis travel at between 500 and 1,000 km/h (around 0.14 and 0.28 km/s) in open water, earthquakes can be detected almost at once as seismic waves travel with a typical speed of 4 km/s (around 14,400 km/h)source needed. This gives time for a possible tsunami forecast to be made and warnings to be issued to threatened areas, if warranted. Unfortunately, until a reliable model is able to predict which earthquakes will produce significant tsunamis, this approach will produce many more false alarms than verified warningssource needed.

    International warning systems (IWS)

    Pacific Ocean


    Japanese Tsunami warning sign
    Tsunami warnings for most of the Pacific Ocean are issued by the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC), operated by the United States NOAA in Ewa Beach, Hawaii. NOAA's National Tsunami Warning Center (NTWC) in Palmer, Alaska issues warnings for the west coast of North America, including Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon and California. The PTWC was established in 1949, following the 1946 Aleutian Island earthquake and a tsunami that resulted in 165 casualties on Hawaii and in Alaska; NTWC was founded in 1967. International coordination is achieved through the International Coordination Group for the Tsunami Warning System in the Pacific, established by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO.[2]

    Indian Ocean (ICG/IOTWS)

    Main article: Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System

    Tsunami Early Warning Tower board in Hikkaduwa, Sri Lanka
    After the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami which killed almost 250,000 people, a United Nations conference was held in January 2005 in Kobe, Japan, and decided that as an initial step towards an International Early Warning Programme, the UN should establish an Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System. This then resulted in a system of warnings in Indonesia and other affected areas.

    North Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected Seas (ICG/NEAMTWS)

    Main article: North Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and Connected Seas Tsunami Warning System
    The First United Session of the Inter-governmental Coordination Group for the Tsunami Early Warning and Mitigation System in the North Eastern Atlantic, the Mediterranean and connected Seas (ICG/NEAMTWS), established by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO Assembly during its 23rd Session in June 2005, through Resolution XXIII.14, took place in Rome on 21 and 22 November 2005.
    The meeting, hosted by the Government of Italy (the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Italian Ministry for the Environment and Protection of Land and Sea), was attended by more than 150 participants from 24 countries, 13 organizations and numerous observers.

    Caribbean

    Ambox current red.svg
    This article needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (July 2014)
    A Caribbean-wide tsunami warning system was planned to be instituted by the year 2010, by representatives of Caribbean nations who met in Panama City in March 2008. Panama's last major tsunami killed 4,500 people in 1882.[3] Barbados has said it will review or test its tsunami protocol in February 2010 as a regional pilot.[4]

    Regional warning systems

    Regional (or local) warning system centres use seismic data about nearby recent earthquakes to determine if there is a possible local threat of a tsunami. Such systems are capable of issuing warnings to the general public (via public address systems and sirens) in less than 15 minutes. Although the epicenter and moment magnitude of an underwater quake and the probable tsunami arrival times can be quickly calculated, it is almost always impossible to know whether underwater ground shifts have occurred which will result in tsunami waves. As a result, false alarms can occur with these systems, but the disruption is small, which makes sense due to the highly localised nature of these extremely quick warnings, in combination with how difficult it would be for a false alarm to affect more than a small area of the system. Real tsunamis would affect more than just a small portion.[citation needed]

    Japan

    Japan has a nationwide tsunami warning system. The system usually issues the warning minutes after an Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) is issued, should there be expected waves.[5][6] The tsunami warning was issued within 3 minutes with the most serious rating on its warning scale during the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami; it was rated as a "major tsunami", being at least 3 m (9.8 ft) high.[6][7] An improved system was unveiled on March 7, 2013 following the 2011 disaster to better access the waves.[8][9]

    Conveying the warning


    Mast with warning system, and sign detailing escape routes, on the coast of Okumatsushima, Miyagi prefecture, Japan (this coast was severely hit by the 2011 tsunami)
    Detection and prediction of tsunamis is only half the work of the system. Of equal importance is the ability to warn the populations of the areas that will be affected. All tsunami warning systems feature multiple lines of communications (such as SMS, e-mail, fax, radio, texting and telex, often using hardened dedicated systems) enabling emergency messages to be sent to the emergency services and armed forces, as well to population-alerting systems (e.g. sirens) and the Emergency Alert System

    Shortcomings

    With the speed at which tsunami waves travel through open water, no system can protect against a very sudden tsunami, where the coast in question is too close to the epicenter. A devastating tsunami occurred off the coast of Hokkaidō in Japan as a result of an earthquake on July 12, 1993. As a result, 202 people on the small island of Okushiri, Hokkaido lost their lives, and hundreds more were missing or injured. This tsunami struck just three to five minutes after the quake, and most victims were caught while fleeing for higher ground and secure places after surviving the earthquake. This was also the case in Aceh, Indonesia.
    While there remains the potential for sudden devastation from a tsunami, warning systems can be effective. For example, if there were a very large subduction zone earthquake (moment magnitude 9.0) off the west coast of the United States, people in Japan, would therefore have more than 12 hours (and likely warnings from warning systems in Hawaii and elsewhere) before any tsunami arrived, giving them some time to evacuate areas likely to be affected.

    See also

  • Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART)
  • Sound Fixing and Ranging (SOFAR) channel

References

  • Salzberg, 2006
  • http://ioc.unesco.org/itsu/
  • Reuters:Caribbean plans tsunami warning system by 2010
  • Martindale, Carol (24 January 2010). "Time right to test disaster awareness system". Nation Newspaper. Retrieved 24 January 2010. A TSUNAMI PROTOCOL to be tested here next month will help Barbadians be better prepared to deal with natural disasters such as earthquakes. ... Harewood said Barbados was nominated and accepted as the "pilot state" for the tsunami protocol which will be discussed from February 22 to 26. He said the objective of the Standard Operational Procedure and Communications Protocol, which has been being worked on for the last two years, is to provide more information on what must be done in the event of a tsunami, earthquake or any other major disaster. He noted that one of the things they would be doing was adopting a general public service announcement through the Government Information Service (GIS) to help increase awareness of tsunamis.
  • "Japan Meteorological Agency|Flow of issuance of information about tsunami and earthquake". Retrieved 15 April 2016.
  • "80 Seconds of Warning for Tokyo". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 15 April 2016.
  • "Emergency Warning System Starting Shortly" (PDF). Retrieved 15 April 2016.
  • "Leaflet "Start of New Tsunami Warning System Operation"" (PDF). Retrieved 15 April 2016.
    1. "Tsunami two years on: Japan finally gets warning system that would have saved hundreds of lives". Retrieved 15 April 2016.

    External links

    Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tsunami warning systems.
    • International Tsunami warnings delivered to mobile phones
    • A 24/7 mobile SMS Integrated Tsunami Watcher Service
    • How does the Tsunami Warning System Work?
    • National Tsunami Warning Center
    • NOAA Tsunami Warnings and Forecasts
    • Tsunami Warning Signs on the Enshu Coast of Japan Shore & Beach, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 52–54, 2010
    • Joint Australian Tsunami Warning Centre
    Categories:
    • Warning systems
    • Tsunami
    • This page was last modified on 10 August 2016, at 09:43.
    Eingestellt von Jerzy Chojnowski Chairman-GTVRG e.V. um 17:57
    Diesen Post per E-Mail versendenBlogThis!Auf X teilenIn Facebook freigebenAuf Pinterest teilen

    Keine Kommentare:

    Kommentar veröffentlichen

    Neuerer Post Älterer Post Startseite
    Abonnieren Kommentare zum Post (Atom)

    Blog-Archiv

    • ►  2019 (1)
      • ►  Januar (1)
    • ►  2017 (38)
      • ►  September (6)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  Juli (11)
      • ►  Juni (3)
      • ►  Mai (1)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  März (6)
      • ►  Februar (6)
      • ►  Januar (3)
    • ▼  2016 (188)
      • ►  Dezember (16)
      • ►  November (6)
      • ►  Oktober (5)
      • ▼  September (28)
        • SEAMERGES AT WORK: DOCUMENTS (1)
        • TSUNAMI 2004 BREAKING NEWS
        • REQUEST TO ISC DIRECTOR DR. AVI SHAPIRA
        • SÉISME ET TSUNAMI À SUMATRA 2004 (RECONSTRUCTION)
        • LE TSUNAMI 26 DÉCEMBRE 2004 MINUTE PAR MINUTE
        • SÉISME ET TSUNAMI DE 2004 DANS OCEAN INDIEN (WIKI)
        • TRZĘSIENIE ZIEMI NA OCEANIE INDYJSKIM 2004 (WIKI)
        • BRIEFLY ABOUT THE GGOS
        • IN BRIEF ABOUT THE IGS NETWORK
        • AUSWIRKUNGEN DES SUMATRA-ANDAMAN BEBENS 2004 AUF S...
        • LÜGEN UND DEUTSCHE REGIERUNGSPROPAGANDA ÜBER DAS T...
        • FRAGMENTARY EVENTS TIMELINE OF THE 2004 TSUNAMI DI...
        • 2004 INDIAN OCEAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI (WIKI)
        • COUNTRIES AFFECTED BY THE 2004 TSUNAMI DISASTER
        • DUTCH HYPOCRISY: MH17 INCIDENT VERSUS TSUNAMI 2004...
        • MARK RUTTE'S STATEMENT ABOUT THE MH17-DISASTER
        • ABOUT RISK AND CRISIS COMMUNICATION
        • RED TAPE
        • THAI METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT
        • HONOLULU STAR-BULLETIN ON TSUNAMI 2004 DISASTER
        • TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM
        • ED FAGAN ET AL. CIVIL ACTION (PETITION & CLAIM)
        • CTBTO OVERVIEW
        • DRUNKEN SAILORS
        • FRENCH TSUNAMI VICTIMS 2004 AND OUR LAWYERS IN ACTION
        • PTWC: ALL-CLEAR FOR THE ATLANTIK
        • QUICK RESPONSE FARCE (QRF)
        • WAKE-UP AND CLARION CALL
      • ►  August (28)
      • ►  Juli (35)
      • ►  Juni (53)
      • ►  Mai (1)
      • ►  April (16)
    Design "Einfach". Powered by Blogger.