The expression is usually applied to people in
positions of authority who abuse their power to avoid or silence criticism or
to deflect guilt of wrongdoing. Those who initiate a cover-up (or their allies)
may be responsible for a misdeed, a breach of trust or duty, or a crime.
While the terms are often used interchangeably, cover-up
involves withholding incriminatory evidence, while whitewash involves releasing
misleading evidence.
Modern usage
When a scandal breaks, the discovery of an attempt to cover
up is often regarded as even more reprehensible than the original deeds.
The mildest case, not quite a cover-up, is simply to release
news which could be embarrassing but is not important enough to guarantee
attention, at a time when other news is dominating the headlines, or
immediately before a holiday or weekend.
Initially a cover-up may require little effort; it will be
carried out by those closely involved with the misdeed. Once some hint of the
hidden matter starts to become known, the cover-up gradually draws all the top
leadership, at least, of an organization into complicity in covering up a
misdeed or even crime that may have originally been committed by a few of its
members acting independently. This may be regarded as tacit approval of that
behaviour.
It is likely that some cover-ups are successful, although by
definition this cannot be confirmed. Many fail, however, as more and more
people are drawn in and the possibility of exposure makes potential accomplices
fearful of supporting the cover-up and as loose ends that may never normally
have been noticed start to stand out. As it spreads, the cover-up itself
creates yet more suspicious circumstances.
The original misdeed being covered may be relatively minor,
such as the "third-rate burglary" which started the Watergate
scandal, but the cover-up adds so many additional crimes (obstruction of
justice, perjury, payoffs and bribes, in some cases suspicious suicides or
outright murder) that the cover-up becomes much more serious than the original
crime.
Cover-ups do not necessarily require the active manipulation
of facts or circumstances. Arguably the most common form of cover-up is one of
non-action. It is the conscious failure to release incriminating information by
a third party. This "passive cover-up" is often justified by the
motive of not wanting to embarrass the culprit or expose them to criminal
prosecution or even the belief that the cover-up is justified by protecting the
greater community from scandal. Yet, because of the passive cover-up, the
misdeed often goes undiscovered and results in harm to others ensuing from its
failure to be discovered. (In Catholic moral theology this would be considered
the sin of omission and a mortal sin.)
Real cover-ups are common enough, but any event which is not
completely clear is likely to give rise to a thicket of conspiracy theories
alleging covering up of sometimes the weirdest and most unlikely conspiracies.
"Snowjob" is an American and Canadian
colloquialism for a deception or a cover-up; for example, Helen Gahagan Douglas
described the Nixon Administration as "the greatest snow job in
history".
Reasons
People, governments, or institutions may try to cover up if
they are dishonest enough to wish to hide things that they should not conceal
(hiding information is not in itself a cover-up); and they believe that they can successfully
cover up the facts, either by effective concealment or using their authority
and power to prevent investigation and publication;
and they believe that public knowledge of the facts will
harm them in some way, from long jail sentences through possible loss of
electoral office to mere embarrassment; and they believe that the benefit of a
successful cover-up outweighs the risk and harm to them of being caught
covering up.
Sometimes an apparently simple and low-risk cover-up grows
out of control. For example, an employee may take money covertly from his
employer to finance something, in the expectation that (s)he will shortly
return it with nobody being the wiser; but the money taken is lost, the
employee cannot make good, and must dangerously extend the cover-up. Compulsive
gamblers, who irrationally think that they will bet the embezzled money, win,
return the stake, and keep their winnings are an example. They will typically
steal more, still intending to repay it with winnings, until eventually the
shortfall can be concealed no longer. The case of derivatives trader Nick
Leeson is similar.
Typology of cover-ups
The following list is considered to be a typology since
those who engage in cover-ups tend to use many of the same methods of hiding
the truth and defending themselves. This list was compiled from famous
cover-ups such as Watergate Scandal, Iran-Contra Affair, My Lai Massacre,
Pentagon Papers, the cover-up of corruption in New York City under Boss Tweed
(William M. Tweed and Tammany Hall) in the late 1800s, and the tobacco industry
coverup of the health hazards of smoking. The methods in actual cover-ups tend
to follow the general order of the list below.
Initial response to allegation
Flat denial
Convince
the media to bury the story
Preemptively distribute false information
Claim that the
"problem" is minimal
Claim faulty
memory
Claim the
accusations are half-truths
Claim the critic
has no proof
Attack the
critic's motive
Attack the
critic's character
Withhold or tamper with evidence
Prevent the
discovery of evidence
Destroy or alter
the evidence
Make discovery of
evidence difficult
Create misleading
names of individuals and companies to hide funding
Lie or commit
perjury
Block or delay
investigations
Issue restraining
orders
Claim executive
privilege
Delayed response to allegation
Deny a restricted
definition of wrongdoing (e.g. torture)
Limited hang out
(i.e., confess to minor charges)
Use biased
evidence as a defense
Claim that the
critic's evidence is biased
Select a biased
blue ribbon commission or "independent" inquiry
Intimidate participants, witnesses or whistleblowers
Bribe or buy out
the critic
Generally
intimidate the critic by following him or her, killing pets, etc.
Blackmail: hire
private investigators and threaten to reveal past wrongdoing ("dirt")
Death threats of
the critic or his or her family
Threaten the
critic with loss of job or future employment in industry
Transfer the
critic to an inferior job or location
Intimidate the
critic with lawsuits or SLAPP suits
Murder;
assassination
Publicity management
Bribe the press
Secretly plant
stories in the press
Retaliate against
hostile media
Threaten the press
with loss of access
Attack the motives
of the press
Place defensive
advertisements
Buy out the news
source
Damage control
Claim no knowledge
of wrongdoing
Scapegoats: blame
an underling for unauthorized action
Fire the person(s)
in charge
Win court cases
Hire the best
lawyers
Hire scientists
and expert witnesses who will support your story
Delay with legal
maneuvers
Influence or
control the judges
Reward cover-up participants
Hush money
Little or no
punishment
Pardon or commute
sentences
Promote employees
as a reward for cover-up
Reemploy the
employee after dust clears
Examples
The John F. Kennedy assassination
The Marilyn Monroe’s murder orchestrated
by Bobby Kennedy on August 4, 1962
The Iran–Contra
affair
The My Lai
Massacre
The Roman Catholic
sex abuse cases of the late 20th and early 21st centuries
The Watergate
scandal
The Tsunami
Massacre, December 26, 2004 (J.Ch.)
Alleged cover-ups
Alleged cover-ups
Conspiracies to cover up the facts of a number of prominent
events have been alleged in the following cases:
The Space Shuttle
Challenger disaster, January 28, 1986
M/S
Estonia disaster
September 11,
2001, terrorist attacks
Attack on the U.S.
diplomatic mission in Benghazi
See also
Blue Code of
Silence
Gatekeepers
Media manipulation
Omertà
Propaganda
Spin (public
relations)
Whitewash
(censorship)
(From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cover-up)
"Mission Cover-up
Accomplished!" (George W. Bush)
"Cover-up? Yes, We Can!" (Barak Obama)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen